Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43437 CA NO. 242 OF 2019 IN COP NO.214 OF 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 242 OF 2019 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 214 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
AIR INDIA LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT AIRLINES HOUSE, 113, GURUDWARA RAKABGANJ ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 001. …APPLICANT (BY SRI. VASANTH KOPPAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. R.V.NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. KINGFISHER AIRLINES LTD., IN LIQUIDATION,REPRESENTED BY THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR …RESPONDENT
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER RULE 117 AND 9 OF THE COMPANY COURT RULES, 1959 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE AFFIDAVIT OF PROOF OF DEBT.
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43437 CA NO. 242 OF 2019 IN COP NO.214 OF 2012
ORAL ORDER Sri.Vasanth Koppar., counsel on behalf of Sri.R.V.Naik., for the applicant has appeared in person. The application is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections. Counsel for the applicant submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is apparent. As could be seen from the application papers, the Company Application is filed on 11.10.2019. The office has raised objection on 09.01.2020. Now we are in October 2025. It's almost been six years, so far the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application. Hence, the Company Application is dismissed for non-prosecution of office objections.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17