916. IA-1634-25.docx Amberkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1634 OF 2025 IN CAVEAT (L) NO. 9650 OF 2024 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 3511 OF 2023 Shakuntala Ramesh Dave .. Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Poonam Vimal Dave .. Petitioner Versus Shakuntala Ramesh Dave .. Caveator ....................  Mr. Atharva A. Dandekar a/w Mr. Hitendra Parab, Advocates for Applicant / Caveator  Ms. Chaitali Jadhav (through VC) i/by Mr. Mehul Shah, Advocates for Petitioner ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2025 P. C. : 1. Heard Mr. Dandekar, learned Advocate for Applicant / Caveator and Ms. Jadhav, learned Advocate for Petitioner. 2. It is seen that Caveat has been filed online but at the time of filing, it was filed under the category of “MISC Documents through e- filing mode”. Thereafter when the said mistake was realized it was refiled but there is a delay of 19 days in filing the Caveat. 3. Ms. Jadhav, learned Advocate for Petitioner has vehemently objected for condoning the delay. 1 of 2 916. IA-1634-25.docx 4. Perused the Interim Application. For the reasons stated therein, Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). The dealy of 19 days in filing the Caveat and the affidavit in support thereof is condoned. 5. The department is directed to proceed with the Caveat in accordance with law. 6. Interim Application is disposed. Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 2 of 2 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date: 2025.12.01 14:59:16 +0530