Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75557 (KAR)

T.U. HARISH v. SMT. LEELAVATHI BABIBITHA NAGESH

WP/16902/2023 · 2025-07-30

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29283 WP No. 16902 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 16902 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. T.U. HARISH S/O LATE T.B. UPRAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.781 10TH D CROSS, 5TH MAIN WEST OF CHORD ROAD BENGALURU - 560 086. 2. SMT. PRAMILA W/O G.V. RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.12 SRI LAKSHMI, 4TH MAIN NANJARASAPPA LAYOUT CANARA BANK COLONY BENGLAURU - 560 072. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHVACHAR M, ADV.) AND: 1. SMT. LEELAVATHI BABIBITHA NAGESH W/O LATE T.U. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.2 J.P. NAGARA 6TH PHASE 3RD MAIN ROAD, YELLAMMA TEMPLE BENGALURU - 560 078. 2. SMT. ANJU @ ANJU YADAV D/O MUDDRANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29283 WP No. 16902 of 2023 RESIDING AT NO. 124 7TH MAIN, 2ND STAGE BASAVESHWARANAGARA BENGALURU- 560 079. 3. SMT. T.U. NIRMALA W/O PRASHANTH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 529/A 9TH MAIN ROAD, M.C. LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU- 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KESHAV KUMAR, ADV., FOR R-1; SRI S. VASANTH MADNAV, ADV., FOR R-2 & R-3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE ORDERS ON IA NO.9 DTD 02.11.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ORDER ON IA NO.10 DTD 01.04.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND ALSO ORDER ON COURT COMMISSIONERS REPORT DTD 05.12.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE- H IN FDP NO.68/2013 PENDING ON THE FILE OF XVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL COURT BENGALURU AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION I.A.NO.9 AND 10. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRILIMINARY HEARING IN B- GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioners respectfully submit that both the parties have settled the matter amicably before - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29283 WP No. 16902 of 2023 the Trial Court. Hence, the writ petition does not survive for consideration, therefore the petitioners may kindly be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KK