BASAVEGOWDA v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MSA/26/2024 · 2025-11-19
M G Uma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75556 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75556 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47791 MSA No. 26 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: BASAVEGOWDA S/O MARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT MADVAPURA VILLAGE, BYLAHALLI POST, SALAGAME HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK - 573 201 …APPELLANT (BY SMT. SHARADAMBA A.R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, H.R.P.2, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, 1ST FLOOR HASSAN - 573 201 …RESPONDENT
THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27.03.2019 PASSED IN LAC.
APPEAL NO.239/2017 ON THE FILE OF 5TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 3.09.2005 PASSED IN OS LAC NO.346/2003 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN), HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.19 OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT.
THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47791 MSA No. 26 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called out.
2. Cost of Rs.500/- was not paid and there are five office objections, which are not yet complied with.
3. The order sheet dated 25.09.2025 reads as under:
"Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks short accommodation to cure the office objections including payment of Court fee. Finally, two weeks time is granted to cure the office objections on payment of cost of Rs.500/- to the Karnataka State High Court Legal Services Committee."
4. Inspite of that, there is no representation. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
BH CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10