Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75552 (KAR)

MINDLOGICX INFRATEC LIMITED v. UNION BANK OF INDIA

WP/33623/2024 · 2025-07-10

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25319 WP No. 33623 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 33623 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MINDLOGICX INFRATEC LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TECHLLANO NO.10/B, GRAPHITE INDIA ROAD, K R PURAM, HOODI VILLAGE, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI SRIJITH PS … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANJAY H SETHIYA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION BANK OF INDIA (ERSTWHILE CORPORATION BANK) CENTRAL OFFICE AT NO 239, VIDHAN BHAWAN MARG, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI - 400 021 2. SMT RAMANATHAN BHUVANESHWARI INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OF M/S. MINDLOGICX INFRATEC LIMITED RESIDING AT C -006, PIONEER PARADISE, 24TH MAIN ROAD, 7TH PHASE, J P NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 078 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V B RAVISHANKER., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI SRINANDAN K., ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25319 WP No. 33623 of 2024 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE INVOICE DTD. 15.10.2024 ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO FILE INC 28 AND REMOVE THE CHARGE AGAINST THE PETITIONER COMPANY AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER This petition is filed seeking to set aside the invoice dated 15.10.2024 issued by respondent No.2 vide Annexure-'A'. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the subject matter of writ petition is ceased of by National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bangalore. 3. If that were to be so, the petition is disposed off as not calling for adjudication, while all contentions of parties are kept open to be urged in the pending proceedings before the NCLT. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25319 WP No. 33623 of 2024 4. Needless to state that all the parties in the present petition to co-operate in the expeditious progress of the proceedings before the NCLT. 5. Sri Hemanth Rao, learned counsel undertakes to file Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent No.1. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR