APHC010076882018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3393/2018 Between: 1. T.M.D. IMDAD, S/O AYUB, AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O. HINDUPUR TOWN, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, GPM AND AR AND COORDINATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. V VEERIAH, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGE MAJOR, OCC PERSONAL ASSISTANT TO MLA, HINDUPUR ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY, R/O. CHOWDESWAR COLONY, HINDUPUR TOWN, ANANTAPUR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents no. 1 to 3 in not taking action pursuant to petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2017 against the 4th respondent for gross misconduct and participating in political activities as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to G.O.RT.No.503, General Administration (GENL and L andC) Department, dated 06.03.2017 and contrary to Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 and consequently direct the respondents to initiate appropriate action against the 4th respondent including removing the 4th respondent from the post of Personal Assistant to MLA, Hindupur, Anantapur District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PONAVOLU SUDHAKARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. P CHANDRAKANTH 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) 3. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents no.1 to 3 in not taking action pursuant to petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2017 against the 4th respondent for gross misconduct and participating in political activities as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to G.O.RT.No.503, General Administration (GENL and L andC) Department, dated 06.03.2017 and contrary to Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 and consequently direct the respondents to initiate appropriate action against the 4th respondent including removing the 4th respondent from the post of Personal Assistant to MLA, Hindupur, Anantapur District and to pass ...” 2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 3393 of 2018 04.07.2025 Mjl /*