Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30858-DB MFA No. 503 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.503 OF 2020 (MV-D) BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. S.S. COMPLEX, UPPER SIDE OF HARSHA H ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. AND ALSO AT REGIONAL OFFICE SHUBHARAM COMPLEX II FLOOR, NO.144, M.G. ROAD BENGALURU-560 025 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. …APPELLANT (BY SRI K. SRIDHARA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. RADHA W/O. MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE AND COOLIE. 2. KUM. MANASA D/O. LATE MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS OCCUPATION: STUDENT. 3. KUM. KOUSTHUBHA D/O. LATE MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS OCCUPATION: STUDENT. Digitally signed by MOUNESHWARAPPA NAGARATHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30858-DB MFA No. 503 of 2020
4. LANDIGIRI HUCHAPPA S/O. KERIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF BARADAVALLI VILLAGE, TALAGUPPA HOBLI SAGAR TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BIMBADHAR M. GOWDAR, ADVOCATE, FOR R-1 TO R-3, & SRI PRADEEP NAIK K., ADVOCATE, FOR R-4)
* * *
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE M.V. ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 25-3-2019 PASSED IN M.V.C. NO.985 OF 2017 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-10, SAGAR, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.16,35,000/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL REALISATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company impugning the judgment and award dated 25-3-2019 in M.V.C. No.985 of 2017 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class and Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-10, Sagar. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30858-DB MFA No. 503 of 2020
2. The Insurance Company denied its liability before the Tribunal on the ground that the driving licence got expired on the date of the accident and therefore, the Insurance Company was not liable to pay the compensation awarded by the Tribunal. 3.
The Tribunal, after considering the facts and evidence on record, has awarded compensation of Rs.16,35,000/- in favour of the claimants and directed the Insurance Company to pay the said compensation to the claimants and recover the same from the owner-cum-rider of the offending vehicle. 4. The accident took place on 15-6-2017 i.e. before the amendment was brought under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, in the year 2022. The relevant law at that time was that even if there are issues with the insurance policy or vehicle owner's actions, the Insurance Company would be directed to pay the compensation, however, with liberty to recover it from the vehicle owner, or the insured party, under certain circumstances. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30858-DB MFA No. 503 of 2020
5. We have perused the judgment. We do not find that the Tribunal has committed any error of law, which requires interference by this Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Amount in deposit, if any, be transferred to the Tribunal, forthwith. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
KVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31