Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
10-16-WP-3768-2024+.DOCX Chaitanya IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3768 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 21402 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3768 OF 2024 Nippon Tube Industries … Petitioner Versus Union of India And Anr. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4612 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 16854 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4612 OF 2024 Mehta Tubes Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner Versus Union of India And Anr. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 21161 OF 2024 New India Extrusions Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner Versus Union of India And Anr. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1947 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 15561 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1947 OF 2025 CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Digitally signed by CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Date: 2025.11.25 10:25:10 +0530
10-16-WP-3768-2024+.DOCX Trishul Metals Industries Ltd. … Petitioner Versus Union of India And Anr. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2166 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 22674 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2166 OF 2025 Agarwal Metal Works Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner Versus Union of India And Anr. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3317 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 15754 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3317 OF 2025 Cubex Tubing Ltd. … Petitioner Versus Union of India And Anr. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3685 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 16855 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3685 OF 2025 Metal Gems … Petitioner Versus Union of India And Anr. … Respondents
10-16-WP-3768-2024+.DOCX _________________________________________________________ Mr. Rishabh Jain i/b TLC Legal LLP, for Petitioner/s. Mr. Karan Adik a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, for Respondents in WP/3768/2024, WP/4612/2024, WP/L/21161/2024 & WP/1947/2025. Mr. Ashutosh Mishra i/b A. A. Ansari, for Respondent No.1- UOI in WP/2166/2025 & WP/3317/2025. Mr. Karan Adik a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in WP/2166/2025, WP/3317/2025 & WP/3685/2025. _________________________________________________________
CORAM : M.S. Sonak & Advait M. Sethna, JJ. DATED : 24 November 2025 ORAL ORDER (Per – M. S. Sonak, J.) :-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Without prejudice, Mr. Adik states that the Interim Applications could be allowed but the Petitions may be disposed of in the light of this Court’s order dated 10 November 2025, disposing of Writ Petition No. 3383 of 2025, and the order dated 24 November 2025, disposing of Writ Petition No. 2207 of 2024 and connected matters.
3. Accordingly, we allow the Interim Applications and dispose them of. The necessary amendment to be carried out within two weeks so that the record is correct. Re-verification is dispensed with.
4. In all these Petitions, the challenge is to the Orders-in- Original made during the pendency of these Petitions. Given our
10-16-WP-3768-2024+.DOCX
order dated 10 November 2025, disposing of Writ Petition No. 3383 of 2025, and the order dated 24 November 2025, disposing of Writ Petition No. 2207 of 2024 and connected matters, we dispose of these Petitions by allowing the Petitioners to institute Appeals against the Orders-in-Original within six weeks from today, after complying with all legal formalities, including pre- deposit etc.
5. If such Appeals are indeed filed within six weeks then the Appellate Authority is directed to consider the same on merits without adverting to the issue of limitation.
6. Further, it would be open to the Petitioners to apply before the Appellate Authority to defer the hearing in the Appeals because of the involvement of the issue of delayed adjudication, given the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order of 02 May 2025, in the case of Union of India And Ors. Vs. GMR Airport Infrastructures Ltd.1. If such Application is made, we are sure that the Appellate Authority will consider the same in the light of the Hon’ble Supreme Courts order.
7. By following the reasoning in the orders referred to above, and by granting the Petitioners similar liberties, we dispose of these Petitions. No costs.
8. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (Advait M. Sethna, J) (M.S. Sonak, J) 1 Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 5392/2025