Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75519 (ALL)

CHATAR PAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9740/2025 · 2025-07-16

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116128 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9740 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chatar Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naresh Chandra Tripathi,Suchita Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the respondent no. 3 being head of committee to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of promotional grade pay scale of post of lecturer on completing 12 years' service on 28.08.2012 and to pay the consequential аrrеаs of service accrued upon the petitioner with further direction to respondent no. 4 to refix the pension of the petitioner on consequential increase of last pay of salary payable to the petitioner of the post of lecturer in the respondent's college within the short stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.4 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance notice on behalf of State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.4, District Inspector of Schools, District Shamli within two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad