Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75487 (KAR)

THE MANAGER, v. SMT. MANJULA,

MFA/5261/2025 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, MEMBER M.F.A.No.5261/2025 (MV-D) (Lok Adalat No.5601/2025) BETWEEN: THE MANAGER, BAJAJ ALLIANZ GIC LTD., BAJAJ ALLIANZ HOUSE, AIRPORT ROAD, YERWADA, PUNE -411 006. NOW REP. BY. THE MANAGER, BAJAJ ALLIANZ G I C LTD., 4TH FLOOR, GOLDEN HEIGHTS, BAJAJ ALLIANZ, 59TH C CROSS, 4TH M BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-10 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. B.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE) AND 1. SMT. MANJULA, W/O. RAJENDRAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT. B. KURUBARAPALLI VILLAGE, BERIKAI POST, SULIGERE TALUK, Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT 2. VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O. LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 3. SMT. GEETHA, W/O. NANJUNDAPPA, D/O. LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 4. CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O. LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 5. SMT. SHWETHA, W/O. VENKATESH, D/O. LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 6. DHANUNJAYA, S/O. LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 2ND TO 6TH RESPONDENTS ARE R/AT DASARAHOSAHALLI VILLAGE D.K.HALLI POST, BANGARPET TALUK 7. KRISHNA. M @KRISHNA MUNISWAMY, S/O. MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT SANKAPURA VILLAGE, DESHIHALLI POST, BANGARPET TALUK ….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.CHETHAN A., ADVOCATE) 3 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.03.2025 PASSED IN MVC NO.31/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF), AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.26,28,187/-, WITH INTEREST 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF DEPOSIT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the respondents/claimants (being authorized by the respondents/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the appellant-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The respondents-claimants have agreed to receive and the appellant –BAJAJ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.19,00,000/- (Rupees Nineteen Lakh only) instead of Rs.26,28,187/- with 6% interest, what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 4 3. The Appellant - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the modified compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the claims tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER TS