ANIL GANPAT UMBARAJE v. SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDALI AND ORS.
WP/9817/2009 · 2025-12-19
Shri Amit Borkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75480 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75480 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
48-wp9817-2009.doc MPBalekar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9817 OF 2009 Anil Ganpat Umbaraje … Petitioner V/s. Shikshan Prasarak Mandali and Ors. … Respondent Mr. Prashant R. along with Sanjeev Kadam for petitioner. M.S. Bane, AGP for the State – Respondent Nos. 2,3 &
5. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : DECEMBER 19, 2025 P.C.:
1. The learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, states that due to passage of time, the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
2. Hence, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1