DEEWAN RAWAL ALIAS DINESH RAWAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/584/2024 · 2025-02-27
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7548 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7548 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.584 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Ms. Divya Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Bhaskar Ch. Joshi, learned AGA with Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned B.H. for the State.
3. Ms. Kavya Shandilya, learned counsel for the private respondent.
4. Heard.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant writ petition in view of the subsequent development of submission of charge- sheet in the matter.
6. As prayed for, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet before the appropriate proceedings.
7. Office is directed to return the certified copy(ies) of the documents furnished by the petitioner in this matter as per rules.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
27.02.2025
R.Dang