IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 256 Rajender Kumar and another Indu CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: None for the petitioner *** NAMIT KUMAR 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner Section 482 Cr.P.C. dated 05.06.2015 Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the court of learned JMIC, Chandigarh as well as summoning order dated 06.12.2019 passed by the learned JMIC, Chand Sections 406 & 498 2. Notice of motion in the present case was issued on 07.03.2024 on the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner settlement. However, as per the office report, no process fee was filed and again an opportunity was granted to do the needful on 30.01.2025. As per the office report, process fee has issued to the respondent. 3. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner 4. Dismissed for non July 15, 2025 Pankaj* IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of Decision: Rajender Kumar and another Versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR None for the petitioners. *** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of criminal complaint dated 05.06.2015 under Sections 323, 506, 406, 498 Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the court of learned JMIC, Chandigarh as well as summoning order dated 06.12.2019 passed by the learned JMIC, Chandigarh whereby petitioners have been summoned under Sections 406 & 498-A IPC read with Section 120 Notice of motion in the present case was issued on 07.03.2024 on the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner settlement. However, as per the office report, no process fee was filed and again an opportunity was granted to do the needful on 30.01.2025. As per the office report, process fee has not been filed and therefore, notice could not be to the respondent. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.47264 of 2021 Date of Decision:15.07.2025 ... Petitioners ... Respondent NAMIT KUMAR The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under criminal complaint No.3027 of 2015 under Sections 323, 506, 406, 498-A, 120-B IPC read with Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the court of learned JMIC, Chandigarh as well as summoning order dated 06.12.2019 passed by the igarh whereby petitioners have been summoned under A IPC read with Section 120-B IPC (Annexure P-3). Notice of motion in the present case was issued on 07.03.2024 on the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners that there are chances of settlement. However, as per the office report, no process fee was filed and again an opportunity was granted to do the needful on 30.01.2025. As per the been filed and therefore, notice could not be There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears not interested in pursuing the matter. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No under No.3027 of 2015 B IPC read with Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the court of learned JMIC, Chandigarh as well as summoning order dated 06.12.2019 passed by the igarh whereby petitioners have been summoned under Notice of motion in the present case was issued on 07.03.2024 on e chances of settlement. However, as per the office report, no process fee was filed and again an opportunity was granted to do the needful on 30.01.2025. As per the been filed and therefore, notice could not be . It appears PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.07.16 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh