- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50719 CRP No. 408 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 408 OF 2022 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE ERANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 2. SRI RAJU S/O LATE EARANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 3. SRI SRINIVAS S/O LATE ERANNA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 4. SMT GANGAMMA W/O LATE ERANNA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 5. SRI GANGADRI S/O ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT MARUVAPALLI VILLAGE PULAKUNTA MANDAL, HINDPUR TALUK ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 515 201 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARI KRISHNA K.A., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50719 CRP No. 408 of 2022 AND: 1. SRI MUTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKAMUTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/O BANDRAHALLI VILLAGE, HOSUR HOBLI GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 561 210 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PUTTARAJA C.P., ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.06.2022 PASSED ON I.A.NO.II IN OS.NO.193/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GOWRIBIDANUR, DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER The revision petitioners no.1 and 2 and the respondent are present. 2. The parties present a joint memo signed by the petitioners, respondent and their respective counsel. The parties would submit that placing the joint memo on record, the suit in O.S.No.193/2019 be dismissed in view - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50719 CRP No. 408 of 2022 of the settlement having taken a sum of ₹10,00,000/-, of which, ₹9,00,000/- is by way of demand draft bearing No.593358, drawn on Canara Bank, Gowribidanur Branch, dated 01.12.2025 and ₹1,00,000/- is cash. 3. On enquiry, the respondent-plaintiff submits that the decision to get the suit dismissed for having taken the sum of ₹10,00,000 is voluntary and there is no force or undue influence or coercion in reaching such a decision. So also revision petitioners no.1 and 2 would submit that to put an end to the litigation, they have paid a sum of ₹10,00,000 to the respondent-plaintiff out of their own volition and there is no force or undue influence or coercion in that regard. 4. Thus, there is no impediment for this Court to dispose of the civil revision petition in terms of the joint memo and dismiss the suit in O.S.No.193/2019 pending on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Gowribidanur. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50719 CRP No. 408 of 2022 5. Hence, the following: ORDER i. Placing the joint memo on record, the revision petition stands disposed of. ii. In view of the contents of the joint memo, the suit in O.S.No.193/2019 on the file of Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Gowribidanur stands dismissed for having taken the sum of ₹10,00,000 from the revision petitioners by the plaintiff, which has been acknowledged in the order sheet and identified by the counsel for the respondent- plaintiff. iii. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63