HARRISON STEEL PVT.LTD. and ANR. v. MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD and ORS.
WP/957/2003 · 2025-11-07
Shri Abhay Ahuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75457 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75457 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
9-WP-957-2003.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2003 Harrison Steel Pvt. Ltd. and another ... Petitioners Versus Maharashtra State Electricity Board and others ... Respondents ………... None for the Petitioners. Advocate Sharva Patel instructed by Little & Co., Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Ms. V.S. Nimbalkar, AGP, for the Respondent-State. ………... CORAM :
ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE :
7 NOVEMBER 2025 P.C. :
1. None for the Petitioners.
2. On 19th September 2025, since none had appeared for the Petitioners, the following order was passed :
“1. None for the Petitioners.
2. It is observed that the Rule has been granted on 10th April, 2003. However, since none appears for the Petitioners, list on 7th November, 2025.
3. It is made clear that if none appears for the Petitioners on the next date, this Court will consider dismissing the Petition.” Kanchan Dhuri 1/2 KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI Digitally signed by KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI Date: 2025.11.07 19:46:23 +0530
9-WP-957-2003.doc
3. This Court had made it clear that if none appears for the Petitioners on the next date, this Court will consider dismissing the Petition.
4. Today, since none appears for the Petitioners, the Writ Petition stands dismissed.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) Kanchan Dhuri 2/2