Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75452 (KAR)

TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD v. STRATEGIC OUTSOURCING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

COP/68/2016 · 2025-11-06

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44887 COP No. 68 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY PETITION NO. 68 OF 2016 BETWEEN: TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD., VSB MAHATAMA GANDHI ROAD, FORT MUMBAI-400 001, REP. BY MR. VISHAL JAIN, GENERAL MANAGER-LITIGATION …PETITIONER (ABSENT) AND: STRATEGIC OUTSOURCING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED 70/25, 80 FEET CIRCULAR RING ROAD, 4TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034, KARNATAKA, INDIA, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. ANAGHA NARASIMHA C.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AJIT P.B., AND SRI. R.K.THONTADHARYA, ADVOCATE) THIS COMPANY PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 433, 434 AND 439 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 FOR WINDING UP OF THE RESPONDENT COMPANY I.E. STRATEGIC OUTSOURCING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED. THIS COMPANY PETITION IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44887 COP No. 68 of 2016 ORAL ORDER The name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Smt.Anagha Narasimha.C.N., counsel on behalf of Sri.Ajit.P.B., for the respondent has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 23.10.2025, on that day, counsel Sri.B.Pramod., was permitted to retire from the case and office was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and the petition was ordered to be listed on 06.11.2025. The petition is listed today by printing the name of the petitioner in the cause list. As already noted above, the name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioner has not engaged the services of an advocate nor conducted the case as a party in person. It appears that the petitioner is - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44887 COP No. 68 of 2016 not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Company Petition No.68/2016 is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37