107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-18600-2025 Date of Decision: 12.08.2025 VIJAY AND OTHERS …PETITIONERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present:- None for the petitioner. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) The case has been called twice, however, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Perusal of the file shows that on the last two dates of hearing, the matter was called twice, however, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE 12.08.2025 Rahul Joshi Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAHUL JOSHI 2025.08.13 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD