Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75428 (MAD)

C.Maheswaran v. The Commissioner of Police,

CRL OP/20050/2025 · 2025-07-16

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.20050 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.07.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.20050 of 2025 1. C.Maheswaran 2. M.Ramya ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner Avadi, Chennai - 600 054 2. The Inspector of Police Avadi Police Station Avadi, Chennai - 600 054 3. P.S.M.Parthasarathi 4. Selvarani ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20050 of 2025 For Petitioners : Mr.Ganesh Ram For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the fourth respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the dispute between the parties is civil in nature and already they have approached the Arbitrator. Still the respondent police are disturbing the petitioners. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that based on the complaint, summon was served on the petitioners for enquiry, however, the petitioners did not appear for enquiry. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20050 of 2025 also perused the materials available on record. 5. Since no adverse order is being passed against the private respondents, notice to the private respondents is dispensed with. 6. It is seen that on receipt of complaint, the respondent police has issued summons to the petitioners for enquiry and it is the duty of the petitioners to co-operate for the enquiry. 7. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed at the admission stage itself. 8. The petitioners are directed to co-operate with the respondent police for enquiry. 16.07.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No ksa-2 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20050 of 2025 To 1. The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner Avadi, Chennai - 600 054 2. The Inspector of Police Avadi Police Station Avadi, Chennai - 600 054 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20050 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN,J. Ksa-2 Crl.O.P.No.20050 of 2025 16.07.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis