IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65104 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka ====================================================== Pintu Kumar Son of Ramdev Yadav Resident of Mahkara P.S -Belhar, Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1 . The State of Bihar 2. Rubi Devi Wife of Sachche yadav Resident of Mahkara P.S -Belhar, Dist- Banka ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 17-09-2025 Heard Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State . 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 76, 352, 351 ( 2 ) and 3 (5) of BNS. 3 . As per the prosecution case, informant namely, Rubi Devi alleged that on 13.04.2025, at about 5 PM, her minor daughter was playing with ball which got bounced away in the house of her neighbour and when daughter of informant went to take her ball, this petitioner came from behind and forcibly opened her pants and also molested her. It is further alleged that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65104 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 when informant went to the house of this petitioner to make complain regarding the aforesaid incident, she was assaulted by accused persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged. Both the parties are next door neighbours. The entire prosecution story is an after thought. As a matter of fact, there is land dispute between both the parties and taking advantage of the situation, this false and concocted case has been lodged against him. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the victim in her statement recorded under Sections 180 as well as 183 B.N.S.S. has supported the prosecution case and Court below assessed the age of victim as 10 years. 6. Considering the nature and seriousness of accusation , statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T