- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50707 WP No. 31605 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 31605 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE VENKATASWAMY, R/O MINAKANAGURKI VILLAGE, MANCHENAHALLI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-5612 11 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. PARIKSHIT S S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU -560 001 2. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562 101 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, GAURIBIDANURU TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-561 208 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE, HCGP) Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50707 WP No. 31605 of 2025 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 AND 3 TO CONDUCT THE WORK OF DEMARCATION OF BOUNDARIES (HADDU BASTU) OF THE PETITIONER LAND IN LAND IN SY. NO. 227/1 AND 227/2 SITUATED IN MINAKANAKURKI VILLAGE MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI AND TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT IMMEDIATELY IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The present petition has been filed seeking for a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to conduct the work of demarcation of boundaries of the petitioner's land in Survey Nos.227/1 and 227/2, situated Minakanakurki Village, Manchenahalli Hobli and Taluk, Chikkaballapura District. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent State, upon instructions, submits that the other co-owners of the property with respect to which an application for Haddu Bastu has been filed have died. It has been submitted that, in light of the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50707 WP No. 31605 of 2025 same, the application for the present cannot be considered. 3. In light of the said submission and taking note of the assertion of learned Additional Government Advocate, the petition is disposed of as not calling for adjudication, but reserving liberty to the petitioner to move an application for demarcation of boundaries afresh after Khatha is changed in the name of the legal heirs of other co-owners, who are stated to have died. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR