Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75407 (PNJ)

RAHUL AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

CWP/18530/2025 · 2025-07-08

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 121 CWP-18530-2025 Date of Decision: 08.07.2025 RAHUL AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Present: Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Gurneet Sagoo, Advocate for the respondents. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present petition is to the result dated 30.03.2025 (Annexure P-4) issued at the instance of respondent No.2, whereby petitioners were removed from selection list for the post of House-Keeper in Territorial Army. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to their grievances, the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 09.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) but the respondents have not taken any action thereupon till date. He contends that the petitioners would be satisfied at this stage, in case respondent No.2- Territorial Army, Group Headquarters, Western Command, through General Officer, Commanding in Chief Chandigarh or by the Competent Authority as designated by him is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 09.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) submitted by the petitioners, by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.07.08 07:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order CWP-18530-2025 -2- Notice of motion. Ms. Gurneet Sagoo, Advocate enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and prays for some time to complete instructions and file response, if necessary. She, however, does not have any objection to the above request. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the consent of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, by directing respondent No.2 or by the Competent Authority as designated by him to consider and decide the representation dated 09.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months of the receipt of certified copy of this order. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JULY 08, 2025. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.07.08 07:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order