M/S SHAHID RAJENDER PARSAD FILLING STATION AND ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
LPA/1368/2023 · 2025-08-29
Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75406 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75406 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
201 LPA-1368-2023 (O&M)
Date of Decision :29.08.2025 M/s Shahid Rajender Parsad Filling Station ..Appellants and another
Versus Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. Mr. Aman Mittal, DAG, Haryana. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents No.2 to 5 submits that even otherwise, time was taken to find out whether the arbitration proceeding are to be initiated keeping in view the agreement between the appellants and the respondents.
3. Keeping in view the totality of the circumstances, as no one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants, present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Civil miscellaneous a pending, if any is also disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE August 29, 2025 (VIKAS SURI) aarti JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.08.29 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document