Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115997 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9771 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Sonkar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Awasthi,Ritika Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records of the case and to quash impugned order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the respondent no. 4 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition). ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the District Inspector of Schools to forthwith decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in terms of judgment rendered in Service Single No. 6416 of 2007 (Madhusudhan Chaubey @ Madhusudhan Chaturvedi vs. State of U.P. & 4 Ors.) having been rendered on 03.01.2012 alongside the circular dated 20.12.2001 and the information which has been supplied on 24.05.2024 within time frame which may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court in extra- ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India."
2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that he has not pressed the prayer no.1.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that he has already made an application to the D.I.O.S. concerned against the order dated 31.05.2025 (Annexure - 1) passed by the Committee of Management.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner made an innocuous prayer that his application dated 31.05.2025, which is pending before respondent no.2, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
6. Heard Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Jitendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition.
7. Taking into consideration of the innocuous prayer made by
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents, the District Inspector of Schools, Prayagraj, respondent no.2 is directed to pass the reasoned order on the application dated 31.05.2025, which is pending before him, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this
order.
8. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad