- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50143 WP No. 6675 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 6675 OF 2014 (L-RES) BETWEEN: M/S BHARAT FRITZ WERNER LTD., MACHINE TOOLS MANUFACTURERS, PEENYA, OFF TUMKUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560022. REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTORS SRI. N.N.UPADHYAY …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. KASTURI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A.Y.N.GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S BHARAT FRITZ WERNER KARMIKA SANGA, NO.25, 4TH CROSS, BYRAPPA LAYOUT, NAGASHETTIHALLI BENGALURU-560094 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI. K.S.SUBRAMANYA 2. THE ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER [ADMIN] AND INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT (STANDING ORDERS) ACT, 1946 KARMIKA BHAVAN Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50143 WP No. 6675 of 2014 BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU [AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 10.02.14] …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. L. MURALIDHAR PESHWA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. RAJENDRA K.R., AGA FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Mr.Kasturi, Senior Counsel appeared on behalf of Sri.A.Y.N.Gupa, counsel for the petitioner, Sri.L.Muralidhar Peshwa, counsel for respondent No.1 and Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.2 appeared in person. 2. Sri.Alphonse Rajkumar J.P., Head Administration, M/S BHARAT FRITZ WERNER LTD., Tumakuru is physically present before the court and he has been duly identified by his counsel. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50143 WP No. 6675 of 2014 3. Sri.K.A.Ganganna - President to the respondent No.1 -Union is physically present before this Court and he has been duly identified by his counsel. 4. Counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.1 jointly submits that the matter has been resolved and a joint memo has been filed and same placed on record and Writ Petition may be disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo. 5. Submission is noted. The joint memo of settlement is placed on record. 6. When queried, they submit that they have taken a conscious decision to settle the matter and have voluntarily signed the joint memo and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order. 7. The oral submission made by the respective parties is place on record. 8. The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15