20-asfa-1243-2001.doc sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1243 OF 2001 Mr. Waman Parshuram Bhandari @ Kini @ Vaity ... Appellant V/s. M/s. Chheda Builders & Ors. ... Respondents _______________________ None for the Appellant. Mr. Rajiv Narula a/w Ms. Nidhi Loya i/by Jhangiani, Narula & Associates for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3. Mr. Prashant Yadav for the Respondent No.5. _______________________ CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J. DATED : 4TH DECEMBER 2025. P.C. : 1. On 20th November 2025, none appeared for the Appellant. The said order also recorded that, even prior thereto, the Appellant, who appeared in person, had sought time, to obtain permission from the Registry to appear in person or appoint an Advocate. 2. Even today, the Appellant appears in person and informs that the Registry has denied him permission to appear in person and that he has failed to appoint an Advocate to conduct the matter. 1/2 SANDHYA BHAGU WADHWA Digitally signed by SANDHYA BHAGU WADHWA Date: 2025.12.05 11:09:27 +0530 20-asfa-1243-2001.doc 3. Upon being posed a query as to why he has not appointed an Advocate, he submits that the Court may pass such an order as it deems =t. 4. Since the matter was kept for dismissal and the Appellant was made aware of the said fact, and since he has neither appointed an Advocate nor sought time to appoint one, I have no other option but to dismiss the Appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. (KAMAL KHATA, J.) 2/2