NASIR ANSARI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/15226/2025 · 2025-07-17
Madan Pal Singh, Siddhartha Varma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116505-DB Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15226 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nasir Ansari And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Neeraj Kumar Chaurasiya Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Madan Pal Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and Sri Neeraj Kumar Chaurasiya, learned counsel appearing for the informant.
2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing of the First Information Report dated 22.05.2025 giving rise to Case Crime No. 203 of 2025, under Sections 61(2), 69, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station - Kotwali Mandi, District - Saharanpur.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that vis-a-vis the first information report dated 22.05.2025 the petitioners had filed a writ petition being CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 12122 of 2025 (Nasir Ansari And 3 Ors. vs. State of U.P. And 2 Ors.) in which on 16.06.2025 the following order was passed:
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Neeraj Kumar Chaurasiya,
learned counsel for respondent no. 3 and learned A.G.A for State- respondents. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 22.05.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 203 of 2025, under Sections- 61(2), 69, 351(3) of B.N.S at Police Station- Kotwali Mandi, District- Saharanpur, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
There are allegations against the petitioners of committing the offence of rape against respondent no. 3 on false promise of marriage. After hearing the rival contentions, totality of facts and circumstances of this case and in view of the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Writ petition No. 7463/2024 (Shobhit Nehra Vs. State of U.P.), the above noted writ petition is disposed of directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of this case within period of 60 days. During the period of investigation and till cognizance is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioners shall not be arrested. In case of non-cooperation with the police investigation by the petitioners, it shall be open for either of the respondents to file recall application of this
order."
4. As of today, the investigation has not been completed. However,
learned counsel for the petitioners states that there is a compromise which has been entered into between the parties.
5. The Court has no reason to believe that the compromise shall not been looked into by Investigating Officer.
6. Under such circumstances, no interference is warranted.
7. The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 18.7.2025 M.S. Ansari (Madan Pal Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad