IN T 236 Jeejan and Ravi (decea CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU challenging Accident Cl under Sectio same has no been adjou appearance matter was a present and seems that appellants a January 15 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR FAO No.2127 of 2 Date of decision : n and another Versus (deceased) through LRs and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Ishaan, Advocate for Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellants. I GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants-claimants have nging the Award dated 19.2.2015 pa ent Claims Tribunal, Ferozepur vide wh Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act ha The present appeal pertains to th has not been issued so far. The order sh adjourned twice i.e. on 01.4.2019 a rance of learned counsel for the appe r was adjourned on request of learned co Even today the arguing couns nt and the learned proxy counsel is req s that neither the appellants nor learn lants are interested to pursue the present Dismissed for non-prosecution. 5, 2025 Asija r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 27 of 2016 (O & M) sion :-15.01.2025 …..Appellants …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate have filed the present appeal 15 passed by the learned Motor ide which their claim petition filed Act has been dismissed. s to the year 2016 and notice in the rder sheets show that the matter has 019 and 22.7.2022 due to non appellants and on 13.9.2019 the ed counsel for the appellants. counsel for the appellants is not is requesting for adjournment. It learned arguing counsel for the esent appeal. tion. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.17 17.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document