Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75377 (BOM)

RAMESH BIHARISINGH GAUR AND ANOTERH v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

WP/691/1998 · 2025-12-04

Shri Abhay Ahuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2-WP-691-1998.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 691 OF 1998 RAMESH BIHARISINGH GAUR AND ANOTHER )…PETITIONERS V/s. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1415 OF 1998 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 691 OF 1998 None for the Petitioners. Ms.Sulbha Chipade, AGP for the State. CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 4th DECEMBER 2025 P.C. : 1. None for the Petitioners. 2. On 3rd October 2025 also since none appeared for the Petitioners, the following order was passed : “1. None for the Petitioners. 2. Mr.Patil, learned Counsel, appears for the Respondent no.1- State and submits that the main relief is against Respondent no.2. 3. No one is present on behalf of the Respondent no.2 – Pune Municipal Corporation. 4. List on 4th December 2025. 5. Let instructions be taken, whether anything survives in the matter or not. avk 1/2 ARTI VILAS KHATATE Digitally signed by ARTI VILAS KHATATE Date: 2025.12.06 14:26:14 +0530 2-WP-691-1998.doc 6. It is made clear that if none appears for the Petitioners on the next date, this Court will consider dismissing the Writ Petition as well as the connected Civil Application.” 3. Ms.Sulbha Chipade, learned AGP, appearing for the State points out that in paragraph 6 of the said order it was made clear that if none appears for the Petitioner on the next date, this Court would consider dismissing the Writ Petition as well as the connected Civil Application. 4. Since none appears for the Petitioner, the Writ Petition as well as the connected Civil Application stand dismissed. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) avk 2/2