Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75372 (BOM)

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-II v. PURNANDU JAIN (HUF)

ITXA/242/2015 · 2025-12-24

Shri S M Modak, Shri Suman Shyam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

33-ITXA-242-2015.DOC Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 242 OF 2015 The Commissioner of Income Tax-II …Appellant Versus Purnandu Jain (HUF) …Respondent Mr Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant-Revenue. Ms Jasmin Amalsadvala (appeared on-line) i/b Mint & Confreres, for the Respondent. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATED: 24TH DECEMBER 2025 PC:- 1. Mr Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant, submits that the tax effect involved in the present Appeal is below Rs. 2 crores. Therefore, in view of the Circular No. 09/2024, dated 17th September, 2024, issued by Government of India, Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the Appeal. 2. Taking note of the above submission of Mr Suresh Kumar, the Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. 3. The formulated substantial question(s) of law is/are, however, kept open to be decided in an appropriate proceeding. 4. Refund of the Court fees, if applicable, be issued, in accordance with Rules, if an application is made by the Appellant on that behalf. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { 24th December 2025 SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2025.12.24 18:14:25 +0530