PAVITHRA PUBLIC SCHOOL v. VARTHANA THIRUMENI FINANCE PVT LTD
WP/6718/2023 · 2025-09-18
B M Shyam Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75344 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75344 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37370 WP No. 6718 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6718 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
PAVITHRA PUBLIC SCHOOL (UNIT OF PAVITHRA EDUCATION SOCIETY) BHAVANI ROAD, HEBBAGODI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU 560099 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAGARATHNAMMA K N.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
VARTHANA THIRUMENI FINANCE PVT LTD 5BC 110, "VRTHNA" OUTER RING ROAD, SERVICE ROAD,
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37370 WP No. 6718 of 2023
HRBR LAYOUT 3RD BLOCK, KALYANA NAGARA, BENGALURU 560043.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING IN NO.
CS/93578/2022 MARKED AS ANNEXURE C CASE NO.CS/93578/2022 MARKED AS ANNEXURE C1 MARKED AS ANNEXURE PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE 3RD CROSS KOLKATA BY ISSUING A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. OR HOLD AND DECLARE THAT THE CASE NO.CS/93578/2022 MARKED AS ANNEXURE C CASE NO.CS/93578/2022 MARKED AS ANNEXURE C1 MARKED AS ANNEXURE C2 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE 3RD COURT, KOLKATA ARE ONE WITHOUT ANY TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37370 WP No. 6718 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
This Court's previous order dated 30.08.2025 reads as under:
"A week's time is finally granted to comply with the office objections.
It is made clear that if office objections are not complied with, list this matter for dismissal in 'orders' list on 15.09.2025."
Despite this peremptory order, no action is taken for compliance and none appears for the petitioner. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for default.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
SA ct:sr