1 2025:CGHC:11246 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 150 of 2019 Savitri Bai W/o Shyamlal Kalar Aged About 48 Years R/o Village - Mohbhattha, Tahsil - Patharia, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. (Def. No. 8), District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Priya Bai @ Priliya Bai D/o Babulal Satnami Aged About 41 Years Wife Of Ratan Satnami, R/o Village - Kirna, Police Chowki- Sargaon, Tahsil - Patharia, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff), District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Babulal S/o Samelal Aged About 66 Years Caste - Satnami, R/o Village - Sendrai, Tahsil - Patharia, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - Motimbai W/o Babulal Satnami Aged About 62 Years Caste - Satnami, R/o Village - Sendrai, Tahsil - Patharia, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mus. Matiyabai W/o Ghasiram Satnami Aged About 28 Years Caste - Satnami, R/o Village - Sendrai, Tahsil - Patharia, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 5 - Dayadin S/o Ghasiram Aged About 4 Years Minor, Represented Through Mother Matiyabai Wife Of Ghasiram Satnami, Caste - Satnami, R/o Village - Sendrai, Tahsil - Patharia, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 6 - Geeta Ram S/o Babulal Satnami Aged About 24 Years Caste - Satnami, R/o Village - Sendrai, Tahsil - Patharia, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI 2025.03.07 10:51:31 +0530 2 7 - Sadhelal S/o Laindas Satnami Aged About 22 Years Caste - Satnami, R/o Village - Sendrai, Tahsil - Patharia, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 8 - Bahorik Kenwat S/o Dharmu Kenwat Aged About 38 Years Caste - Satnami, R/o Village - Sendrai, Tahsil - Patharia, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 9 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Mungeli Chhattisgarh. (Defendants), District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For State : Mr. T. S. Sahu, PL. SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 06.03.2025 Since no one appears to prosecute the matter on behalf of the appellant, even in the second call, under the circumstances, this Court is left with no option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of the prosecution. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Ajay.