Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7533 (CAL)

ANITA SIKARI v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

WPA/2052/2025 · 2025-02-06

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl.No. 53 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 06.02.2025 WPA 2052 of 2025 Anita Sikari -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Nikhil Kr. Gupta … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Lal Mohan Basu … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner intends to amend the prayers and, thereafter, prefer a fresh writ petition. As none appears on behalf of the State, Mr. Lal Mohan Basu, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State, is directed to represent the State. His appointment to the brief be regularized by the concerned authorities. In view of the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, WPA 2052 of 2025 is dismissed as not pressed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file afresh. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)