CWP-17984 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (236) Amarjit Singh and another State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated (Annexure P Ludhiana. 2. concedes that the instant petition is a misconceived motion, as the impugned order can be ass Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Therefore, the petitioners may be relegated to the authorities concerned, to avail the statutory remedy. 3. 17984-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amarjit Singh and another Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Harish Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr. S.S. Gill, Advocate for respondent No.2. None for respondents No.3 and 4. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated (Annexure P-1), as passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly concedes that the instant petition is a misconceived motion, as the impugned order can be assailed, by filing a statutory appeal, under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Therefore, the petitioners may be relegated to authorities concerned, to avail the statutory remedy. The asked for prayer of the petitioners is accepted. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17984-2023 Date of Decision : 17.07.2025 …Petitioners Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab Advocate for respondent No.2. None for respondents No.3 and 4. Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated 11.04.2022 1), as passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly concedes that the instant petition is a misconceived motion, as the impugned ailed, by filing a statutory appeal, under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Therefore, the petitioners may be relegated to authorities concerned, to avail the statutory remedy. etitioners is accepted. Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of 11.04.2022 1), as passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly concedes that the instant petition is a misconceived motion, as the impugned ailed, by filing a statutory appeal, under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Therefore, the petitioners may be relegated to MANPREET SINGH 2025.07.18 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-17984 4. Authority concerned, by filing a statutory appeal, within a period of 30 days, from the date of receipt of copy of this order, along with an application for condonation of delay, the latter sha maintained the instant misconceived motion before this Court, while adjudicating the application for condonation of delay, and shall decide the application sympathetically. 5. July 17, 2025 Manpreet 17984-2023 In case, the petitioners approaches the learned Appellate Authority concerned, by filing a statutory appeal, within a period of 30 days, from the date of receipt of copy of this order, along with an application for condonation of delay, the latter shall consider the fact that the petitioners has maintained the instant misconceived motion before this Court, while adjudicating the application for condonation of delay, and shall decide the application sympathetically. Consequently, the instant writ petition is , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 In case, the petitioners approaches the learned Appellate Authority concerned, by filing a statutory appeal, within a period of 30 days, from the date of receipt of copy of this order, along with an application for ll consider the fact that the petitioners has maintained the instant misconceived motion before this Court, while adjudicating the application for condonation of delay, and shall decide the petition is disposed of. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No In case, the petitioners approaches the learned Appellate Authority concerned, by filing a statutory appeal, within a period of 30 days, from the date of receipt of copy of this order, along with an application for ll consider the fact that the petitioners has maintained the instant misconceived motion before this Court, while adjudicating the application for condonation of delay, and shall decide the MANPREET SINGH 2025.07.18 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment