SUDHIR ANAND SINGH v. CHITRA BANSBAHADUR SINGH AND ANR.
TS/30/2013 · 2025-11-28
Sharmila U Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75319 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75319 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
12 TS-30-2013.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 30 OF 2013 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 944 OF 2012 Sudhir Anand Singh ...Plainti Versus Chitra Bansbahadur Singh and Another ...Defendants —————— Mr. Priyas Jani, Ms. Sayali Shinde i/b Vigil Juris for Plainti. ——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : 28th November, 2025.
P. C. :
1.
Learned counsel appearing for Plainti submits that there were two caveats which were -led in the present Petition. He submits that Chitra Singh was one of the Caveator who expired on 20th September, 2017 and other Caveator Ms. Rekha Mahendrakumar Singh expired on 10th March, 2018.
2. There has been no fresh Caveat -led by the legal heirs and no appearance on behalf of Defendants.
3. In light of above, both the Caveats stand disposed of as abated. Resultantly, Testamentary Suit No. 30 of 2013 is disposed of.
4. Testamentary Petition No. 944 of 2012 to proceed for grant.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Sairaj 1 of
1 2025:BHC-OS:22734