Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 753 (PNJ)

VANITA CHAUHAN v. PUSHP RAJ CHAUHAN

TA/542/2025 · 2026-04-17

Archana Puri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 TA-542-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.143 TA-542-2025 Date of Decision: 17.04.2026 VANITA CHAUHAN ....Applicant Versus PUSHP RAJ CHAUHAN .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Shubham Goyal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate for the respondent. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (ORAL) Report has been received from the Mediation Centre. As per the same, settlement has reached between the parties. The original settlement/agreement, duly signed by the parties, as well as the relatives of the parties concerned and the Mediator, has also been annexed with report Both the counsel submits that said settlement/agreement has been reached between the parties, voluntarily, without any undue influence worked on their minds. Perusal of the settlement/agreement reveals that the parties have agreed to seek divorce by mutual consent and the terms settled have been reflected in paragraph No.6 of the said settlement. HIMANSHU VATS 2026.04.18 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 2 TA-542-2025 In view of the settlement, so reached, at this stage, counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to pursue with the transfer application and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. However, the parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement, as recorded in the settlement/agreement entered into in the Mediation Centre. (ARCHANA PURI) 17.04.2026 JUDGE Himanshu Vats Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HIMANSHU VATS 2026.04.18 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document