INDUSIND BANK LIMITED v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9794/2025 · 2025-07-23
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75294 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75294 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9794 of 2025 Petitioner :- Indusind Bank Limited Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Petitioner by means of present writ petition, has prayed for following relief:
"I- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to release the Registration Certificate of the Vehicle No.UP 50 CM 3656 (Car) in favour of petitioner. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 24.02.2025 within stipulated period."
3. Petitioner is a Bank and has granted loan to respondent no.4- Rahul Singh for purchase of a Car bearing Registration No.UP50 CM 3656. 4. According to the petitioner, respondent no.4 has defaulted in payments of EMI and therefore, the petitioner has approached the respondent no.3-Assistant Regional Transport Officer, District Jaunpur for doing needful in respect of Form No.36 and 37. In this respect, petitioner has submitted representation dated 24.02.2025, copy of which is at Annexure no.4 to the writ petition. 5. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent no.3 has not yet considered the application of the petitioner for transferring the Registration Certificate in favour of the petitioner. 6. Learned Standing Counsel states that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith earlier representation dated 24.02.2025, necessary documents as well as certified copy of this order raising his grievances before the respondent no.3-Assistant Regional Transport Officer, District Jaunpur within a period of one month from today.
In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3- Assistant Regional Transport Officer, District Jaunpur shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, after issuing notices and giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent no.4, within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner, Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Mohit (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad