IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9324 of 2017 ====================================================== 1. Hari Narayan Paswan and Ors Son of Late Raghu Paswan 2. Shyamdeo Paswan son of Late Hari Nandan Paswan 3. Janki Nanda Paswan son of Late Sheo Nandan Paswan 4. Smt. Siya Mani Devi daughter of Late Deo Nandan Paswan all residents of Village and P.O.- Korawan, P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Divisioal Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna. 3. The Collector, Nalanda 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Hilsa, District- Nalanda. 5. The Circle Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda. 6. Satendra Prasad, son of Late Deo Narayan Singh, resident of Village and PO- Korawan, P.S. Hilsa, District Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sajid Salim Khan -SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 21-04-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though learned counsel for the State is present. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “A. For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari setting aside the order dated 8.12.2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.L.T. Case No. 1379 of 2015 contained in Annexure-9. Patna High Court CWJC No.9324 of 2017(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/3 B. For quashing the order dated 3.11.2012 passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Hilsa in Land Dispute Case No.41/12-13 contained in Annexure-8 herewith. C. For quashing the order dated14.07.2015/28.07.2015 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division in Land Appeal Case No.11 of 2013 contained in Annexure- 8/1. D. For staying the operation of the order dated 3.11.12 passed by the DCLR, Hilsa contained in Annexure-8 and the order dated 8.12.2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.L.T.Case No.1379 of 2015. E. For passing any other order/s, command/s or appropriate writ/s which your lordships deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.” 3. Learned counsel for the State as also respondent no. 6 submits that the gairmazarua aam pokhar which is source of irrigation for the people there, the same has been encroached Patna High Court CWJC No.9324 of 2017(2) dt.21-04-2025 3/3 and in that background, no interference is required. 4. Though the point raised by the learned State counsel as also the learned counsel for the respondent no. 6 has force, since there is non-appearance on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U