IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CWP-5334-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.07.2025 Smt. Santosh Devi ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G. Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. Seeking direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularisation in light of the policy decision dated 29.07.2011, the instant writ petition has been filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly conceded that the petitioner does not fulfill the condition of continuous service for 10 years prior to the regularisation Policy of 2011 and is marginally short. He however submits that the said issued is already pending consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP(C)-18374-2022. He submits that the present petition may be disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondents to re-consider the claim of the petitioner for eligibility after the decision of SLP(C)-18374-2022. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection to the same. MANGAL SINGH 2025.07.28 13:37 I am the author of this document 2 210 CWP-5334-2017 (O&M) 4. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondent(s)-State that they shall take a fresh decision with respect to the claim of the petitioner for regularisation in light of the judgment that may finally be rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP(C)-18374-2022. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 24.07.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.07.28 13:37 I am the author of this document