Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7529 (BOM)

TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION JALGAON v. BHIKA ANANDA PATIL AND ANR

CA/1499/2025 · 2025-04-15

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 242 to 245 (Delay) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1495 OF 2025 IN FAST/2767/2025 Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation Jalgaon VERSUS Baliram Fataru Bhoi Died Thr Sunanda And Ors ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1497 OF 2025 IN FAST/3014/2025 Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation VERSUS Shobhabai Gopal Patil And Ors ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1499 OF 2025 IN FAST/3018/2025 Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation Jalgaon VERSUS Bhika Ananda Patil And Anr ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1606 OF 2025 IN FAST/4034/2025 Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation Jalgaon VERSUS Shivcharan Narayansing Thakur And Anr ... Adv. S. P. Kulkarni, Advocate for Applicant Adv. V. S. Badakh, AGP for Respondent-State ….. CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : 15TH APRIL, 2025 2025:BHC-AUG:11312 2 242 to 245 (Delay) PER COURT :- 1. Heard Ms. Kulkarni, learned Advocate appearing for applicant. 2. Applicant seeks to condone the delay of 231, 336, 336 and 345 days respectively caused in filing appeals. 3. Perused the applications and reasons stated therein. Delay is appears to be caused due to administrative exigencies, applicant has not derived any advantage by making delay. Sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Hence, Civil Application is allowed. Delay of 231, 336, 336 and 345 days respectively caused in filing appeals is hereby condoned. 4. Appeals be registered, subject to removal of office objections. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) Rushikesh/2025