APHC010076212020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4869/2020 Between: 1. KOTA KODANDARAMI REDDY, S/O KOTA LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.4-2-4, EETHAMUKKALAVARI STREET, OLD TOWN, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. MOVVALA RAMA MOHAN RAO, , S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O LAKSHMINARAYANA TRADE AND STEEL, CEMENT SHOP, OPP. APSRTC BUS STAND, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VALAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAVALI RURAL POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. CHINRATANAMITTA RAMA REDDY, S/O BALA RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O NEAR LATHA CINEMA HALL, GANGA BHAVANI LODGE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. KOTA SURENDRA REDDY, S/O RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O MUSUNURU VILLAGE, KAVALIMANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. T BHASKAR, , S/O T. RAMALINGAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SRI HARSHA HOME NEEDS, OPP. NAMASKAR HOTEL, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. KOPOORUHARI REDDY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, MUSUNURU VILLAGE, KAVALIMANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 9. KATHIREDDYVIJAYA REDDY, S/O RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O MUSUNURU VILLAGE, KAVALIMANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 10. KATHIREDDYVIJAYA REDDY, S/O RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O MUSUNURU VILLAGE, KAVALIMANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PAVANI SIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 3rd respondent in not taking any action against the respondent No.5 to 10 and registering the FIR as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300 A of the Constitution of India, apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to take necessary action and register the FIR.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, the matter is purely related to civil issues and as such, the Respondent – Police has not registered the case based on the complaint of the Petitioner. 3. Ms.A.V.Sai Lakshmi, learned counsel representing Sri Pavani Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioners to work out their remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4869 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh