Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75280 (PNJ)

SATISH KUMAR v. MAHINDER PAL SINGH AND OTHERS

COCP/3410/2025 · 2025-08-21

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-3410 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 Satish Kumar @ Bhiri Maninder Pal Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. record. 2. 31.01.2024 (Annexure P CWP-1928 the respondents have been directed as under: 3. filing the present contempt has been issued to the petitioner by respondent No. 1 Municipal Council Jaito, Tehsil Jaito, District Faridkot. 3410-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Satish Kumar @ Bhiri Versus Maninder Pal Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Brinder Pal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 is Learned counsel for the petitioner submits 31.01.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 1928-2024 titled as ‘Satish Kumar vs. the respondents have been directed as under: “After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 6, i.e. Executive Officer, Municipal Council Jaito, District Faridkot, to look into th 08.11.2023, Annexure P-9, and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law weeks from today .” It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after filing the present contempt petition, a speaking order dated has been issued to the petitioner by respondent No. 1 Municipal Council Jaito, Tehsil Jaito, District Faridkot. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3410-2025 Date of Decision: 21.08.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Brinder Pal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 is taken on Learned counsel for the petitioner submits vide order dated -ordinate Bench of this Court in vs. State of Punjab and others’, the respondents have been directed as under:- After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 6, i.e. Executive Officer, Municipal Council Jaito, District Faridkot, to look into the representation, dated 9, and decide the same rdance with law preferably within four by learned counsel for the petitioner that after petition, a speaking order dated 18.08.2025 has been issued to the petitioner by respondent No. 1-Executive Officer, Municipal Council Jaito, Tehsil Jaito, District Faridkot. taken on vide order dated Bench of this Court in After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 6, i.e. Executive Officer, Municipal Council Jaito, e representation, dated 9, and decide the same within four by learned counsel for the petitioner that after 18.08.2025 Executive Officer, RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.21 19:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3410 4. the petitioner w dated 18.08.2025 5. in pursuance of the Speaking Order dated possession of the shop shall be delivered to the of 04 weeks from today. 6. submits that the instant petition may be disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case the respondent(s) 7. aforesaid li 8. 9. 21.08.2025 rishu 3410-2025 -2- A copy thereof, handed over in Court the petitioner which is taken on record. The aforesaid speaking order 18.08.2025, reads as under:- “This is on the direction of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court regarding CWP No. 1928 of 2024 to decide the case in accordance with law. The same has been put up House to consider the case through its resolutions No.130 dated 17/09/2024. The Committee decided to give him shop measuring 13’ X 16’ at Ramleela Ground, Reru Wala Chowk, Jaitu. The same has been sent for fixation of rent of that s in resolution No.150 dated 07/02/2025. The same has been put in the house. But they have not decided anything and put in abeyance. Whatever decision house will take the same will be implemented.” Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 submits that in pursuance of the Speaking Order dated possession of the shop shall be delivered to the of 04 weeks from today. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition may be disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case, necessary compliance is not made the respondent(s) within the time as stipulated above. The present petition stands disposed of, iberty to the petitioner. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 5 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable A copy thereof, handed over in Court by learned counsel for hich is taken on record. The aforesaid speaking order “This is on the direction of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court regarding CWP No. 1928 of 2024 to decide the case in accordance with law. The same has been put up in Municipal Committee House to consider the case through its resolutions No.130 dated 17/09/2024. The Committee decided to give him shop measuring 13’ X 16’ at Ramleela Ground, Reru Wala The same has been sent for fixation of rent of that shop in resolution No.150 dated 07/02/2025. The same has been they have not decided anything and put Whatever decision house will take the same will be Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 submits that in pursuance of the Speaking Order dated 18.08.2025, reproduced above, possession of the shop shall be delivered to the petitioner within a period learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition may be disposed of, with liberty to the necessary compliance is not made by within the time as stipulated above. disposed of, accordingly, with Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No by learned counsel for hich is taken on record. The aforesaid speaking order “This is on the direction of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court regarding CWP No. 1928 of 2024 to in Municipal Committee House to consider the case through its resolutions No.130 dated 17/09/2024. The Committee decided to give him shop measuring 13’ X 16’ at Ramleela Ground, Reru Wala hop in resolution No.150 dated 07/02/2025. The same has been they have not decided anything and put Whatever decision house will take the same will be Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 submits that 18.08.2025, reproduced above, petitioner within a period learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition may be disposed of, with liberty to the by RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.21 19:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.