ARNAV SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/15142/2025 · 2025-09-15
Rajiv Gupta, Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75279 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75279 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15142 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. Learned AGA has filed counter affidavit in Court today itself, which is taken on record.
2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case investigation has already been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid fact but has submitted that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum raising all their contentions.
4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that the instant case has not been decided on merits.
5. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules. September 16, 2025 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayank Prakash Rawat, Surendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Arnav Sharma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad