Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75275 (KAR)

G MAHENDRA v. VENKATESH

CRL.A/292/2020 · 2025-07-30

S Rachaiah

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29320 CRL.A No. 292 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 292 OF 2020 (A) BETWEEN: G MAHENDRA S/O M GOVINDAPPA HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A NO.20/2, MANJUNATHA GENERAL STORE, I CROSS, SWASTHI ROAD SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-27 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. T C SATHISHKUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: VENKATESH S/O T KULLEGOWDA HINDU, MAJOR WORKING AS HOPCOMS HEAD OFFICE, LALBAGH DR M H MARIGOWDA ROAD BENGALURU-560 004 …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.10.2019, PASSED BY THE XX A.C.M.M., AT BENGALURU CITY IN C.C.NO.26747/2016, ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF THE N.I ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29320 CRL.A No. 292 of 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Case called out. Today, the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. However, learned counsel for the appellant remained absent. Office objections are not complied in spite of sufficient time having been given for compliance of office objections. It appears that the learned counsel for the appellant is not interested to proceed with the case. Therefore, it is appropriate to dismiss the Criminal Appeal for non-compliance of office objections. 2. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE NM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1