IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65007 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Aman Kumar S/o- Sri Binod Kumar R/v- Daulatpur Ps- Warisaliganj Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mrs. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 88 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111, 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 66, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. 3. As per prosecution case, on receiving information about location of a mobile number used in cyber crime, a raid was conducted on the basis of tower location. In the raid conducted by the police petitioner and two other co-accused persons were apprehended and from their possession mobile phones were recovered including the mobile phone bearing no. 6202323276 which was used in crime and the same was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65007 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/4 recovered from the possession of co-accused Kanhaiya Kumar. Apart from the recovery of mobile phones, a number of documents were also seized from the place. Further, recovery of Rs. 21,62,000/- was made from the said house. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has nothing to do with the number from which the cyber crime was committed. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the person or possession of this petitioner. There is recovery of mobile phone from the petitioner and the petitioner has produced its purchase receipt. Even the sims are in the name of the petitioner. The seized cash belongs to the family of the petitioner which has been kept for the marriage of the sister of the petitioner. Moreover, the father of the petitioner owns 8 acre and 3 decimal cultivable land and also cultivates land taking the same on rent. The cash was for the purpose of marriage of sister of the petitioner and also for the purpose of cultivation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has come on record to show that the petitioner used to cheat the people and no complaint has come made against the petitioner whatsoever. Petitioner is having antecedent of one case and he is on bail in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65007 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/4 this case. Petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2025 and charge- sheet has been submitted. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the lack of substantive material to connect the petitioner with the offence as alleged and also considering the period of custody of the petitioner and submission of charge-sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Nawada/ concerned court in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 88 of 2025, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below. (iii) In case of absence on three Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65007 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 4/4 consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. balmukund/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T