1/2 10-COMIP-149-2014.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 149 OF 2014 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.16 OF 2014 IN COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 149 OF 2014 Mr. Jaaved Jaaferi ...Plaintiff Versus Viking Media And Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Known As Jmj Entertainment Pvt. Ltd.) And Anr. ...Defendants _______ None for the Plaintiff. Ms. Srishti Magdum i/b Parinam Law Associates, for the Defendants. _______ CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 13 th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C. 1. None for the Plaintiff. 2. The matter was placed on board 'for directions' today. When the matter was called, learned counsel for the Defendant pointed out that even on 22 nd July 2025, none has appeared, and hence the matter was stood over to 12 th August 2025 under the caption ‘for directions’. 3. Ms. Magdum, learned counsel for the Defendants then pointed out that by the order dated 12 th August 2025, the Plaintiff were represented through counsel and were granted one last chance to file their convenience compilation. She submits that the matter was then to be placed under the caption 'for dismissal’ in the event the convenience compilation was not filed before the next date. Vaibhav 2/2 10-COMIP-149-2014.DOC 4. Ms. Magdum then points out that the Plaintiff has not complied with this order and is also not present today. Hence, it is clear that the Plaintiff is not desirous of prosecuting the suit. The suit is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Vaibhav