- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27251 WP No. 13661 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 13661 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. N. LATHA W/O MUNISHAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/OF CHEMANDAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. 2. SRI. NAGARAJAPPA S/O LATE HOTTEAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/OF JINNAGARA VILLAGE JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.S. VINOD, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SEENAPPA K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. VENKATESHAPPA S/O LATE MUNIBATHYAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE MUNIBATHYAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27251 WP No. 13661 of 2020 3. SRI. MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE MUNIBATHYAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 4. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE MUNIBATHYAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 5. SMT. BATHYAMMA D/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA W/O LATE CHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 1 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF KANNURAHALLI VILLAGE DODDAGATTIGANABBI POST, KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.G. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R5; VIDE ORDER DATED 23.06.2025, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R3 IS HELD SUFFICIENT; R1 AND R2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDERS QUASH THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU, IN FDP 23/2012, DATED 14.09.2019, VIDE ANNEXURE-M AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27251 WP No. 13661 of 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Sri.C.S.Vinod, learned counsel submits that in view of the decision by this Court in the case of Smt.Gowramma v. Sri.Krishnappa in WP No.47953/2017 dated 29.02.2024, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a suit within the time stipulated by this Court. 2. Considering the said submission, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the suit within a period of 60 days from today. 3. Interim order granted by this Court is extended till 60days. The parties are directed not to precipitate the matter based on the compromise decree till 60 days. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14 CT: BHK