IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70540 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== 1. Anoj Thakur Son of Suresh Thakur R/O Vill.- Kharba, O.P.- Nawada Bazar, P.S.- Rajoun, Dist.- Banka. 2. Gyani Devi Wife of Anoj Thakur R/O Vill.- Kharba, O.P.- Nawada Bazar, P.S.- Rajoun, Dist.- Banka. 3. Kumkum Kumari D/O Anoj Thakur R/O Vill.- Kharba, O.P.- Nawada Bazar, P.S.- Rajoun, Dist.- Banka. 4. Ganesh Thakur Son of Mahesh Thakur R/O Vill.- Deokunda, P.S.- Sanhoula, Dist.- Bhagalpur. 5. Neha Devi @ Neha Kumari Wife of Ganesh Thakur, D/O Anoj Thakur R/O Vill.- Deokunda, P.S.- Sanhoula, Dist.- Bhagalpur. 6. Sumesh Thakur Son of Mahendra Thakur R/O Vill.- Deokunda, P.O. and P.S.- Goradih, Dist.- Bhagalpur. 7. Suman Devi Wife of Sumesh Thakur R/O Vill.- Deokunda, P.O. and P.S.- Goradih, Dist.- Bhagalpur. 8. Devanand Thakur Son of Anirudha Thakur @ Late Anirudha Thakur R/O Vill.- Dhankar, P.S.- Sabour, Dist.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 09-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 354B, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per prosecution case, on 20.04.2024, while Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70540 of 2024(3) dt.09-01-2025 2/3 informant was sitting at her door, these petitioners came there and started abusing and disrobing her and upon protest, petitioner No. 1 gave lathi blow on the head of informant. It is further alleged that petitioner No. 2 committed theft of silver chain of informant and when children of the informant came to the rescue, they were also assaulted by these petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to petty dispute, an altercation took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners are simple in nature. Case and counter case. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the backdrop of the case and clean antecedents, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Rajoun (Nawada) P. S. Case No. 212 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70540 of 2024(3) dt.09-01-2025 3/3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T