IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.136 Rinku The State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Govind Chauhan Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit Deputy Commissioner, 05.06.2025 (Annexure P 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction on the representation petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to concerned, preferably within order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 07.07.2025 Prince Whether speaking/reasoned IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus The State of Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Govind Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. Deputy Commissioner, Karnal to take a decision on the xure P-4), submitted by the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. representation/complaint dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to , preferably within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18391-2025 Date of decision : 07.07.2025 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be h a direction to respondent No.2- on on the representation/complaint dated the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.2 to take a decision (Annexure P-4), submitted by the by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE : Yes / No PRINCE SAINI 2025.07.08 22:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document