Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MPM No. 354 of 2025
Date of decision 03.03.2025
Jai Parkash ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh
....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : None for the petitoner. For the Respondent : Ms. Niyati Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for respondent/State.
Rakesh Kainthla,Judge (Oral)
Perusal of para-4 of the petition shows that petitioner wanted to attend retirement party of his father on 28.02.2025 and required interim bail for the said purpose. Since the date of retirement of his father has been lapsed, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
2.
In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Rakesh Kainthla)
Judge 03rd March, 2025
(Ravinder)