Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75196 (PNJ)

SUHAIL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/18925/2024 · 2025-09-24

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (294) Suhail State of Haryana CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Court that the prayer made through the instant writ petition has become infructuous, and therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the same. 2. been rendered infructuous September 24, 2025 Manpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Nafeesh Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navee Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner apprises this Court that the prayer made through the instant writ petition has become infructuous, and therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the same. Consequently, the instant writ petition is been rendered infructuous. 24, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18925-2024 Date of Decision : 24.09.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Advocate , DAG, Haryana. very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner apprises this Court that the prayer made through the instant writ petition has become infructuous, and therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the same. Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner apprises this Court that the prayer made through the instant writ petition has become having MANPREET SINGH 2025.09.25 18:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment